|If the facts as delineated through this page are correct, then fraud has extended into all aspects of life and each group of carpet-baggers covers for the others.|
|I was alleging to be a victim of a plot to remove me from RAFAEL (Israeli Armament Development Authority), because I was a Whistle Blower. An American citizen holding dual citizenship, Dr. Moshe M. Lavid, had allegedly networking with RAFAEL. Apparently he collaborated with the State of Israel to defraud the people of the United States. If you do read Hebrew, you might follow the links to pleading documents, filed at Israeli Courts. The Cause of Action herein is libel, predicated under the provisions of the Israeli Law.|
|Stop Abuse HomePage
The Israeli Nexus
|content of the entire site
For the best viewing result TRIM your browser
in New Jersey at USDC
Ref. Case 1184/97 Read the background storysecondary window|
Lawsuit was filed January 1997 with the Magistrate Ct. in Petach Tikva (Israel)
disposed June 1998 to District Ct. in Jerusalem.
On May 24, 1999, case was partly denied by the District Court in Jerusalem, Docket No. 1360/98, on the ground that I had failed to prove that State employees had acted maliciously.
On June 13, 1999, the same court granted my motion to include a monetary relief over non-monetary damages. Defendant, Dr. Moshe Lavid may file a defense over this amendment.
On July 13, 1999, I filed a civil appeal 4685/99 with the Sup. Ct. (Jerusalem)
I am pleading that the District Court overlooked testimonies and that the lawsuit was alternatively alleging negligience. Moreover, the lower court accepted a forged letter and had improperly barred me from bringing crucial evidence.
On Oct 5, 1999, the Court decided
The remaining dispute is over the amount of liability over non-monetary damage.
On Dec 13, 1999, the Court moved bakwards.
Then the Court realized that the expert's testimony on my behalf would show that the previous (May 1999) ruling was wrong! Therefore Judge Ben-Zimra proposed (in fact forced) the two parties to file affidavits, provided that he would ignore the expert testimony on my behalf.
Next hearing is schduled for February 27, 2000.
On Feb 24, 2000, the parties reached an agreement.
Parties who have already filed affidavits agree to waive cross examinations.
Court decision: Within 7 days plaintiff may file a response (2000 words affidavit) to rebute contended facts in respondent's affidavit, that concenrs his non-monetary damage. Plaintiff may bring evidence generated before lawsuit was filed. Plaintiff may file his sumation within 21 days, thereafter respondent may file his sumation within 21 days. Feb 27, 2000, hearding is canceled.
Both parties were permitted and filed additional affidavits and sumations.
Complementary verdict was given on May 22, 2000, over which plaintiff has filed a complemantary appeal pending!
Herein a flashback commencing with the first preliminary hearing session.
My original lawsuit|
filed January 14, 1997:
An answer filed by the
Israeli State Attorney
on behalf of private persons:
April, 20 1997
My counter response|
to this answer
May 23, 1997:
Dr. Lavid's Answer|
December 23, 1997:
|Motion to Appeal|
the decisions of Hon. Judge Diskin
1432/98, filed January 27, 1998:
Motion to Appeal Denied|
by Hon. Judge Goerstel
February 1, 1998:
Initial article about this case English,
or Hebrew by Mr. Eyal Gutman
was published in a local Israeli magazine "Kol Karmiel" May 30, 1997
Other cases of a conspiracy against civil servants:
Ha`aretz: RAFAEL is ordered by
Supreme Court, in the matter of Dr. Arnon Bone Ha`aretz: RAFAEL is condemned by
Supreme Court, in the matter of Mr. Israel F.
Ha`aretz: RAFAEL is ordered by Supreme Court, in the matter of Dr. Arnon Bone
Ha`aretz: RAFAEL is condemned by Supreme Court, in the matter of Mr. Israel F.
Private comments | SIGN Guest Book | VIEW Guest Book
Stop Abuse Directory Seeking Representation in NJ
This Page had been Hosted By Revised October 25, 2001